BIM62010 - Mineral extraction: sinking mine shafts

Expenditure on sinking a mine shaft (see Coltness Iron Company v Black 1TC287 and BIM62045), or deepening such a shaft (see Bonner v Basset Mines Ltd 6TC146 and BIM62050), is capital expenditure of a mineral extraction trade and therefore not an allowable deduction in computing the taxable profits of that trade.

However, if the source is worked, mineral extraction allowances can be claimed for such expenditure under CAA01/Part 5 (see CA50100 onwards).

Where the minerals lie in pockets or seams exploration work to locate further minerals may be allowed, whether successful or not, as long as the mine continues to be worked by means of the original shaft. This includes expenditure on trial borings from the surface or by drifts from the workings.

However, where such borings or drifts result in the sinking of a further shaft the exploration expenditure, as well as the expense of sinking the shaft, is not allowable (see BIM62005).

The expense of work undertaken to recover a lost seam, in the case of a mine worked in faulty ground, is allowable as long as the mine continues to be worked by means of the original shaft.