The case of Mason v Innes [1967] 44TC326, shows that where an individual who carries on a profession
the decision in Sharkey v Wernher (see
BIM33630) cannot be applied to claim tax
under Case II of Schedule D on the market value of the gift, or the
difference between the market value and the disposal price, as the
case may be.
Any such disposition should, however, be considered for
Capital Gains Tax liability.
A report should be made to Business Tax (Technical) in any
case where an Inspector is in doubt as to the application of the
decision in Mason v Innes and, in particular, where-
See BIM35735 for information about the facts in Mason v Innes.