There are many prizes and awards open to authors and other
creative artists (one publication lists nearly 200 for authors
alone) and entering competitions or seeking awards is a normal part
of such professions.
Where an award, grant, bursary or prize is received, the
determining factor in considering whether or not such an award etc
is taxable is the quality of the award in the hands of the
recipient. If it comes to the individual as an incident in the
exercise of his or her profession or vocation (including a
subsidiary or part-time activity the profits from which are
assessed under Case II of Schedule D), it should normally be
treated as a professional receipt within Case II of Schedule D.
(See Temperley v Smith [1956] 37TC18, Smart v Lincolnshire Sugar Co
Ltd [1937] 20TC643, Duff v Williamson [1973] 49TC1, CIR v Falkirk
Ice Rink Ltd [1975] 51TC42, and McGowan v Brown and Cousins [1977]
52TC8). The facts relating to the award or prize should be
considered for each case.
In some cases publishers enter works for competitions and
entries direct from the author are not permitted although the
permission of the author is usually a part of the entry conditions.
To attract liability, it is not essential that the author should
have applied for the award or prize personally. Nor does the author
necessarily have to undertake to complete a particular piece of
work during the currency of the award or to refund the award in the
event of failure to complete a programme of work.
Case II of Schedule D is not the only charging section. The
facts may show that the award is one of the following-
A literary etc prize which is unsolicited, and which is awarded
as a mark of honour, distinction or public esteem in recognition of
outstanding achievement in a particular field, including the field
in which the recipient operates professionally, is not chargeable
to tax. In 1979 the Special Commissioners found for the taxpayer in
a case involving a literary award. The case attracted some press
publicity as a reporter was admitted to the proceedings. The book
was entered for the competition by the publisher without the
author's consent. The decision turned very much upon its own facts
and, in particular, a finding that the award was unsolicited and
did not represent the proceeds of exploitation of the book by the
author personally or by his publishers as agents on his behalf.
Case of doubt or difficulty which cannot be resolved on the
lines outlined above should be referred to Business Tax
(Technical).