Connected parties might create extremely long leases and
spread the reverse premium over an unrealistically long period. For
example, a group property company might pay a reverse premium to a
group trading company as an incentive to lease trading premises for
99 years without any provision for rent reviews. The trading
company could then claim that Urgent Issues Task Force Abstract 28
required it to spread the receipt over 99 years, rendering the tax
effect trifling.
In order to discourage this kind of arrangement,
FA99/SCH6/PARA3, ITTOIA05/S102 and ITTOIA05/S311 (4) contain
special timing rules. They apply only where:
Relevant arrangements are the
relevant transaction, (see
BIM41095), and any arrangements made in
connection with it, whether earlier, simultaneously or later
(FA99/SCH6/PARA8 (2)).
In ITTOIA05/S102 and ITTOIA05/S311
relevant arrangements are called
property arrangements. The definition of property
arrangements is in ITTOIA05/S103 (b).
Connected persons are persons connected within the
meaning of ICTA88/S839 at any time in the period when the relevant
arrangements (or property arrangements) are made (FA99/SCH6/PARA8
(1) and ITTOIA05/S103 (a)).
To decide whether the terms of any arrangement are not such
as would reasonably have been expected from parties dealing at
arm's length, the test is as follows. Do the terms of the deal
actually made differ to a significant extent from terms which:
(FA99/SCH6/PARA3 (4) and ITTOIA05/S102 (2))
If you have reason to believe arrangements are uncommercial,
you should seek the opinion of the District Valuer. A request for
assistance should be made in the form of submission, setting out in
full the terms of the arrangements made, and your reasons for
seeking advice.
If the conditions for applying FA99/SCH6/PARA3, ITTOIA05/S102
or ITTOIA05/S311 (4) are met, the receipt is to be brought to
account in accordance with
BIM41135.