BIM41125 - Receipts: reverse premiums: timing of the charge: the normal case


Having simply prescribed that a reverse premium is a revenue receipt, the legislation leaves the timing of the charge to be governed by correct accountancy treatment in the normal case. Unless avoidance is involved, a reverse premium will normally be brought to account for tax purposes as it is credited in the accounts, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice. The avoidance case is considered in BIM41130 (ICTA88/S21A (1) and FA98/S42 (1); ITTOIA05/S25 and ITTOIA05/S272).

Note this does not necessarily mean you are obliged to accept the spread of the receipt actually adopted in the accounts. It means you are entitled to be satisfied that the accounts treatment does reflect generally accepted accounting practice.

Recommended accountancy treatment of reverse premiums is in the Urgent Issues Task Force Abstract 28 (UITF28). The receipt is to be spread on a straight line basis over either the term of the lease, or to the date of the first rent review expected to adjust the rent to prevailing market rate, whichever comes first. Thus, there will be no need to adjust the commercial profit shown in the accounts unless either there is reason to believe UITF28 has not been followed, or the anti-avoidance rule in BIM41130 applies.

For periods of account beginning on or after 1 January 2005 companies and other entities, for example partnerships and unit trusts, may use international accounting standards for tax purposes. The international standard equivalent to UITF28 is SIC15 (lease incentives). They give different results:

  • Under UITF28 the lease incentive is spread over the shorter period of the lease term and the date of the first rent review to market rates.
  • Under SIC15 the incentive is spread over the lease term regardless of the rent review periods.

For more about the relationship between tax and accountancy – see BIM31000 onwards.