The words 'the full amount of the profits or gains' have been
interpreted by the Courts as requiring the consideration of
'profits' as that word would be understood in its ordinary sense in
commercial life. This involves setting against the receipts of a
trade etc in any given period the expenses incurred to earn those
receipts. More specifically those profits are to be those
calculated in accordance with the correct principles of commercial
accountancy,
BIM31020. That result is not, however,
conclusive of the quantum of the profits for tax purposes; the
Taxes Acts may still require specific adjustments.
In summary the approach is a two stage process as
follows:
This means that if there are no relevant tax rules or principles
which affect a particular case, correct accountancy principles will
determine the amount of the taxable profit. This two stage approach
was legislated in subsection (1) of section 42 , see
BIM31004. It follows on from the view
encapsulated by Sir Thomas Bingham M.R. in Threlfall v Jones and
Gallagher v Jones [1993] 66TC77 at page 123E:
Indeed, given the plain language of the
legislation, I find it hard to understand how any judge-made rule could override the application of a
generally accepted rule of commercial accountancy which (a) applied
to the situation in question, (b) was not one of two or more rules
applicable to the situation in question and (c) was not shown to be
inconsistent with the true facts or otherwise inapt to determine
the true profits or losses of the business.
The tax adjustment in 2 above can be made in two ways:
or
The over-riding requirement is that the method shall arrive at the full amount of the profits or gains of the year. In some circumstances the commercial accountancy may be otherwise inapt to determine the true profits or losses of the business and alternative computation methods are used.