Customers are entitled, by law, to a review by HMRC of its
appealable tax decisions, that is, decisions (other than
restoration decisions) where any appeal would be to the Tax Chamber
of the tribunal, see
ARTG1010.
So where customers disagree with HMRC’s decision or
assessment and want a review, HMRC must carry out a review of its
decision, see
ARTG4030.
This review will be carried out by a review officer, who is,
in most cases, outside the direct line management chain of the
decision maker and was not involved in making the decision.
In direct tax, see
ARTG1060, either HMRC may offer a
review, see
ARTG4220, or the customer can ask for
one, see
ARTG4290.
In indirect tax, see
ARTG1070, HMRC must
But any customer with a right of appeal may send an appeal to
the tribunal whether or not HMRC has carried out a review; see
ARTG2410 and
ARTG3100, unless the appeal is against a
decision about the restoration of seized goods, see
ARTG6210.
The aim of the review is to provide an additional
opportunity to resolve the dispute without the need for a tribunal
hearing.
Since review officers have not been involved in the
decision, they provide a fresh viewpoint. Reviews help make sure
both that the decision has been properly made and that, in
HMRC’s view, it is legally correct and one which we would
defend at tribunal.
HMRC has a Quality Assurance process to make sure that the
reviews
Reviews are time-limited and customers have the right to make
representations to the review officer to make sure that their point
of view is understood, see
ARTG4220 and
ARTG4230.
When the review is finished the review officer will write to
the customer to tell them the outcome of the review, see
ARTG4820.
Once the review officer has told the customer of their
conclusions, the customer has a further period within which they
can notify an appeal to the tribunal. The conclusion of the review
is HMRC’s official position and the decision maker must take
the appropriate action to implement it.