AH0745 - Commissioners’ Hearings: Evidence: ‘Proving' documents


Regulation 5 of The General Commissioners (Jurisdiction and Procedure) Regulations 1994 (SI1994/ 1812) and Regulation 6 of The Special Commissioners (Jurisdiction and Procedure) Regulations 1994 (SI1994/ 1811) govern the `proving’ of documents (see AH0465).

`Proving' a document simply means satisfying the Commissioners that it is what it purports to be, in other words, that it is genuine. Generally, to prove a document formally you must call as a witness either its author or someone else who can verify its authenticity. A document supplied by a third party can only be proved by the third party concerned. Clearly, if everyone accepts that a particular document is authentic by agreeing or admitting it, then, in any event, formal proof would not be required. Because you admit a document you are not prevented from criticising its content or putting your own construction on it in accordance with the evidence.

If a document which you wish to put in evidence is not admitted or agreed by the taxpayer you may think formal proof is necessary or desirable. This may be, for example, because you wish to emphasise the weight that the Commissioners can attach to the document and its contents or because your case relies heavily upon it and, in those circumstances, you should call the signatory to or author of the document as a witness to `prove' it. If it is a document which can be proved by a witness called for the appellant, then you must put it to him during cross-examination.