Revenue & Customs Brief 52/07 ‘Place of supply of trading allowances in greenhouse gas emissions’ stated that further guidance would be issued on the VAT treatment of non-compliance carbon credits. This is covered in this Brief alongside the VAT treatment of carbon offsetting services. Revenue & Customs Brief 52/07 is no longer extant, having been superseded from May 2008 by guidance published in Notice 741 Place of Supply of Services (until December 2009) and since 1 January 2010 by the new Notice 741A Place of Supply of services.
This Brief covers the VAT treatment of supplies of carbon credits and services provided by carbon offset providers. For the purposes of this brief, ‘carbon offset providers’ offer advice and/or the facility to reduce an individual’s ‘carbon footprint’.
Carbon credits fall into two categories:
The important distinction, for VAT purposes, between compliance market credits and VERs is that the former are capable of consumption of the type envisaged by the VAT system, and the latter are not. As VAT is a tax on consumption, this means that compliance market credits are subject to VAT, whilst VERs are outside the scope of VAT.
Compliance market credits are recognised under statutory ‘cap and trade’ regimes. Polluting businesses which are subject to these regimes must hold, or obtain on the open market, and then ‘retire’ sufficient emissions credits to cover their emissions. If they do not, then they will suffer financial penalties. The credits are consumed to enable businesses to engage in economic activity without penalty, and to meet their Kyoto commitments.
Kyoto and the EUETS provide for exacting verification and regulatory processes, which mean that both parties to a compliance market transaction are able to attribute a subjective value to the credit units. The credits are widely traded on national and international markets.
The motive of an individual paying for a credit does not matter, nor does it matter what is done with it. Thus if a private individual buys a compliance market credit, the supply of the credit to the individual is still taxable (even though the individual is not subject to any regime) because the credit is capable of consumption.
Examples of compliance market credits include Emission Reduction Units (ERUs), Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) and EU Allowances (EUAs).
A Verified Emission Reduction (VER) is essentially a promise that carbon has been or may be reduced somewhere in the world. There may be a general benefit to the reputation of a business (good PR/marketing/corporate responsibility) in paying for a VER, but no particular service is rendered which can be identified as a cost component of the business. There is therefore no consumption. No service is being provided to an identifiable consumer and no benefit is being provided which is capable of forming a cost component of the activity of another person in the commercial chain.
Payment for a VER might produce a general social benefit, it might produce a specified result, or it might give rise to a legal relationship with reciprocal obligations. However, a taxable person’s income is relevant for VAT purposes only if it constitutes the consideration for a supply of goods or services to a consumer. The mere fact that something is or may be done in exchange for a payment is insufficient to bring such a transaction within the VAT system. The public at large cannot constitute a specific recipient of the kind which must exist in order to give rise to a transaction chargeable to VAT.
Further, and in marked contrast to the situation with compliance market credits, we have seen no evidence of the existence of a genuine secondary trading market in VERs.
There are a growing number of businesses providing carbon offsetting services. The range of services offered varies widely, but the VAT treatment of any individual transaction will depend on the particular arrangements. Because arrangements vary so widely, it is not considered practicable to provide anything beyond general advice in this brief.
In many situations, when a member of the public makes a payment to a carbon offset provider, there is no supply for VAT purposes. This is because there is no identifiable, direct benefit being received by the member of the public in return for their money.
Examples would be where a carbon offset provider makes a commitment that funds paid across by members of the public will be used to fund overseas projects, wind farms, development of environmentally friendly energy generation projects etc. without making any supply of direct benefit to the person making the payment. In such scenarios, the payment by the member of the public is outside the scope of VAT.
A common arrangement is where an airline offers its passengers the facility to offset the carbon emissions generated by their flights, perhaps via a third party carbon offset provider. Generally the passenger pays across an amount, calculated to be the cost of offsetting the resulting emissions, but receives no identifiable, direct benefit in return. There are a number of possible variants, including:
In other situations, a carbon offset provider might make taxable supplies of carbon credits (supplies of compliance market credits are currently zero-rated), or of the purchase and ‘retirement’ of compliance market credits (standard-rated), or of general advice on how an individual or a business can improve its energy efficiency (standard-rated).
Whether you are an offset provider, or simply a business incurring VAT in order to offset your own carbon emissions, you must follow the usual rules to determine whether any VAT incurred is Input Tax and the extent to which it is recoverable.
Further information can be obtained from the HMRC website contact the Helpline on Tel 0845 010 9000.
Issued 15 June 2010